Archive for category Feature
To Post or Not To Post
Editorial: The views and opinions expressed herein are the author’s own personal thoughts and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of the Chico Writer’s Groups membership.
By Kathie Leung
Should Aspiring Authors Maintain Websites and/or Blogs?
One of the most recent discussions we’ve been having is about the importance of blogging as an aspiring author. There are many theories out there, but the determining factor boils down to why. Why is a blog necessary?
To an unpublished author intending on going the old school way of publishing, meaning via a literary agent with the intentions of being published hard copy, there doesn’t seem to be a good enough argument for a blog. A static web page or site, yes, but a blog – no. Since this is merely a summation of the discussion, a follow-up post with the specific arguments on either side along with supporting evidence will be provided. But for the purpose of this post, we will leave it at that.
A static page or website provides a curious literary agent with a bit more insight into the author, a means for putting a face to the name should the author be bold enough to post a mugshot on the site, perhaps a sample of his/her writing. Anything more could potentially be shooting yourself in the foot. Blogging with articles about writing, thoughts, ideas, character development, politics, the grade your dearest got on a recent essay might be a bit too much information and a potential liability for the agent and/or the publishing house where your book might have been sold. Of course it depends on what specifically you say – or don’t, the points of view you offer, how liberal or conservative you happen to be; but as a general rule, a blog is iffy. If you simply must write snippets and publish them to the ‘net, why not create a blog with a screenname other than your own via any number of the free blog services out there? Just be careful not to link to them with your professional ‘net presence.
If you go with establishing an Internet presence, put some thought and consideration of what you put out there for the world to see. Once it posted, it will never ever go away. That includes Facebook, Google+, MySpace, and Twitter. Querying an agent and seeking publication is like a job interview. Your potential employer (agent/publisher) will look and what you say and do on the Internet will be weighted accordingly. Pose a potential liability? Kiss that contract goodbye. Climb on the bandwagon thrashing an author who did this or that and what does that say about your own character? Is that a risk a publisher or an agent is willing to take if they sign you? The fact is this: we have come into an age where instant communication and public announcements made world wide is a mainstay. What might have seemed insignificant in the past, such as an erroneous web site, an unfollowed blog, a tweet made at two-thirty in the morning while three sheets to the wind, are all taken much more seriously, scrutinized, legally decided upon: Is this individual a risk we are willing to take on?
What Should Go Into A Static Website?
Your name. Your contact information that you are comfortable making public (and I mean public) such as email address (always good to have a specific account set up via Google, Yahoo! and the likes that can be disowned later on if the spam and what have you get out of control), a USPS mailing address (PO Box, preferably for the same reasons unless you really don’t mind weirdos coming to your door when they’re three sheets to the wind or better yet, off their meds), etc. The genres you write in, any publications where your work has been published (with links, of course), possibly some links to your favorite authors or agents, writing forums, etc. and then a chapter or two of your completed works that you’re in the process of actively sending out queries and pitching at conferences.
What Should NOT Go Onto A Website?
Anything personally identifiable. Don’t post pictures of your kids. Don’t post a map to your city. Don’t post your cell phone number. Don’t post your social security number, tax-id number, credit card information. Just don’t. Even if you have -1 followers, never, ever post anything personal.
What if I have no intentions of traditionally publishing my work and am moving straight into self-publishing?
The key here is selling your work, right? You want people to read your novel, more importantly to buy your novel. Blogging from a main character’s point of view is a nifty idea so long as you’re not giving your novel away for free. But blogging about the craft of writing without selling a significant number of books? Probably not such a good idea. That’s my own personal opinion.
We (The Chico Writer’s Group) have had self-published authors come through our doors in the past and I know others who have self-published as well. With one exception, there is a reason why these individuals self-published: they couldn’t take the rejection from the agents they were querying. But was their writing worthy of going into print? With one exception – hell no. Did they have a good grasp on the craft? Absolutely not. Did they provide useful advice on how to write? Nope.
It’s dangerous to be out there writing about the craft if you aren’t well versed in it. This, of course, is an argument many have in the kingdom of writing. There are some who strongly believe that unless you are a published author, meaning through the traditional process, you have no right to be giving advice about the craft. There are others who feel there is merit to talking about the craft, so it all boils down to where you personally stand on the issue. But if you are intending on using your site to promote your self-published work, my advice is to keep your thoughts, opinions, and advice regarding the craft completely separate from the promotional website/blog.
What are the Pros of Blogging?
Selling your books once you actually are published.
Making your writing samples accessible to literary agents you are querying.
Establishing links with other authors, both published and aspiring, that might lead to book sales once you are published.
Possibly gaining attention from someone who might put you on the path towards publication.
What are the Cons of Blogging?
Time. It takes a lot of time to blog and keep up with the whole process of maintaining a blog. If you stop blogging for any reason, it takes a long time to reestablish yourself within the network once you return.
Promoting thoughts and ideas which others might be offended by. I know of authors, from best sellers to strictly self-published, who have spewed their personal opinions on anything from politics to religion. And I know that in several cases, their opinions were so strong that they offended their readership, enough that some of those who were offended stopped reading them altogether, both their blogs and their novels. In one particular case, there was a call to boycott the author.
Wearing egg on your face. Blogging about things you think you know about but might come to learn later on you clearly did not could be potentially damaging. Of course, a well-thought out post that doesn’t necessarily put the thoughts out there as unarguable fact and leaves it open for dialog – and such dialog follows the golden rule of debating the thought, not attacking the thinker, would prevent this from being problematic thus moving this from a con to a pro. All depends on how you handle conveying the thoughts and the subsequent discussion.
Will Not Having a Site/Blog HURT Sales?
I don’t know if there is a way to actually tell this. I happen to like the idea of an author establishing a presence on the Internet, but if I’m looking for a new author, I’d be more likely to tune into Amazon’s recommended reading lists, the New York Times, and up until recently, Oprah’s book club reads. Once I became familiar with the author, I might follow them on Facebook, connect with them on Google Plus, add them on Twitter (even tho I’m hardly ever there) and hunt them down on the web. Still, I’m hardly a repeat visitor but that’s just me. I know of some that are so into the characters an author builds or the style the author writes in that they become obsessed. I aspire to become one of those that can create obsessable (yes, my own word) characters and style.
Joe Konrath, author of the best selling Jack Daniels books (an obsessable character) has an excellent website for readers, authors, and those in the business of publishing.
Be careful when reading posts off a search about this topic. The date of the post is the most important thing to consider. Anything that has been discussed prior to the big push to self-publish and epublish without the use of an agent (e.g. directly via a publisher) is outdated. More information and resources to come in a few weeks.
As always, you are welcome to post your comments and thoughts on this topic!
Kathie Leung is a published author of poetry and short stories and an aspiring author of mystery/thriller/suspense novels. She is the founder, organizer, and moderator of the Chico Writer’s Group. More about Kathie can be found at www.kathieleung.com
#Queryfail on Twitter
Agents and editors are posting snippets of what makes a query fail. Searching Twitter using the #queryfail tag, you can see all of these tweets. This has been a very educational, if not funny, experience.
Here are some of the pass/fail, along with sage advice, query tweets (taken verbatim)
| “dear editor, hello! I would like to thank you for taking the time to read the first 3 chapters…” Absolutely no need, seriously | fail |
| “The purpose of this letter is not earth shaking, so, if it will be ignored, and I’m sure it will” Yeah. Now it will. | fail |
| “Allow me the privilege of publishing it through your company, so I can be the best selling author I know I am meant to be.” | fail |
| The Artichoke and the Onion: A Love Story (in which artichoke peels away layers to reval its “secret hidden place inside”) | fail |
| Here are synopsis for fifteen completely different projects I’ve completed. I am currently working on these 5 additional novels. | fail |
| Greetings from Sweden. We hardly have any agents. So I sent my query directly to the publisher. Book’ll be out this spring. | fail |
| “P.S. I collect stamps. Should you have any stamp… that is destined for the trash can, [please] stuff them in the enclosed SASE. | fail |
| Page numbers, no. Chapter heading, no. ANY sort of header, no. #queryfail, yes | fail |
| Dear XX Publishing, I guess I am unable to write a synposis that is short and reflects my manuscript so…” | fail |
| “Have u ever lost yr partner in the fringes of a war u didn’t approve of which subjecting him to an unsubstantiated war?” Grammar | fail |
| I’M TYPING MY QUERY IN ALL CAPS SO YOU WILL BE SURE TO NOTICE IT. Okay, now that my pupils have stopped burning | fail |
| “This is a very exciting narrative which relates how I was attacked by a whore house” Exciting in what sense? | fail |
| “[TITLE redacted] contains sexually graphic descriptions, a violent rape scene [...] and mayhem. On the bright side…” No. | fail |
| It is unnecessary (and $$$) to fed-ex queries, it ends up in the same stack. | advice |
| “enclosed is a sample of my book XX. It is incomplete but there is enough for you to get an idea of the content.” Errr…. | fail |
| Creepy query = having your character send the query | fail |
| My favorite query typo from past: She mustard her power | fail |
| A classic: don’t use a spokesperson, ok? Don’t let your dad/lawyer/wife/brother query on your behalf | advice |
| If your spam blocker has to authorize my response to your query, I probably won’t resent – approve agent emails ahead of time | advice |
| FedExing with signature required a query letter? | advice |
| not using contractions in your character dialogue/narrative… (unless it’s time period appropriate) | advice |
| Don’t send me your manuscript and tell me to start reading at page 312 because that’s “where it gets good” | fail |
| It isn’t a #queryfail, but you should know that unnecessary pen names do make me wonder about you | advice |
| These words are the kiss of death: “first book in a [multi]-book series | fail |
| People, query one book at a time please | advice |
| Handwritten query on scrap paper w/ eyeblass ad/7th bday party cloud paper/label peel saying “Sorry about the paper, we recycle” | fail |
| You want to write a nonfiction book but you have no impressive credentials or platform? This is a huge issue, folks | advice |
| Sentence fragments, which are not used for effect | fail |
| “This novel is very similar to The Da Vinci Code but much more plausible and better written.” | fail |
| “I read about ur interest in poetry so Im querying U” Really? Where? You mean in my gidelines whre it says I dont accept poetry? | fail |
| “I have covered my sexual exploits with literally hundreds of women, mostly exotic dancers” – sorry, yuck | fail |
| Authors, PLEASE use a tracking system and don’t query the same agent multiple times with an already-rejected book! | advice |
| Writing back to my form rejection for me to recommend another agent at my 2 person agency. | advice |
| Tight first paragraph, references, a recent relevant blog post of mine, awesome hook, good pages. Query WIN! | pass |
| One line hook, wordcount, genre, short blurb, short paragraph of writing background and polite closing. Query win | pass |
| tells me you read interview with me re: your genre, tells me what you learned from interview, & how your book is a fit. Win. | pass |
| Top reasons I don’t read further: overwriting, info dumping and starting the story in the wrong place (often relates to info dump) | advice |
If you’d like more information, please leave a comment and be sure to include a working email address (will not be published but necessary for a response.)
Happy query writing!
Writing Exercise Gone Wrong
Recently a very witty email circulated with famous personalities answering the question "Why did the chicken cross the road?" Alas, there was room to grow and so members of the Chico Writer’s Group were handed an "optional" writing exercise which was to add to the laundry list. Here you are: (the bits contributed by CWG members are acknowledged, the remainder came via the original email, hats off to the originator of this!)
TOM BROCKAW: I don’t care why the chicken crossed the road but I wish he would stick to the rules he established and do it in less than a minute. (Contributed by Lynn Houston)
KATIE COURIC: Now, Miss Chicken, would you say that you crossed the road because you wanted to set an example for the other chickens, or should I say, flock; or was this a statement? Maybe you felt there was a better selection of grain or maybe you were simply fed up with the pecking order, not that I’m putting words in your mouth… or should I call it a beak? (Contributed by Kathie Leung)
BARACK OBAMA: The chicken crossed the road because it was time for a change! The chicken wanted change!
JOE BIDEN: I saw that chicken on Union Street in Wilmington. He was
having a meal at Katie’s Restaurant. I said to him "Hey, how’s it going?" and he said "You know, I was doing really well until my house was foreclosed and I had to cross the road to live elsewhere. And I had to walk here because I couldn’t afford to fill my gas tank." (contributed by Brad Cook)
JOHN MC CAIN: My friends, that chicken crossed the road because he recognized the need to engage in cooperation and dialogue with all the chickens on the other side of the road.
SARAH PALIN: I’m not going to answer that question because I want to talk straight to all those hockey moms and Joe Six-Packs out there and say, doggone it, we’re not going to let the government tell that chicken how to cross the road. (Contributed by Brad Cook)
HILLARY CLINTON: When I was First Lady, I personally helped that little chicken to cross the road. This experience makes me uniquely qualified to ensure right from Day One! that every chicken in this country gets the chance it deserves to cross the road. But then, this really isn’t about me.
GEORGE W. BUSH: We don’t really care why the chicken crossed the road. We just want to know if the chicken is on our side of the road, or not. The chicken is either against us, or for us. There is no middle ground here.
DICK CHENEY: Where’s my gun?
COLIN POWELL: Now to the left of the screen, you can clearly see the satellite image of the chicken crossing the road.
BILL CLINTON: I did not cross the road with that chicken. What is your definition of chicken?
AL GORE: I invented the chicken.
JOHN KERRY: Although I voted to let the chicken cross the road, I am now against it! It was the wrong road to cross, and I was misled about the chicken’s intentions. I am not for it now, and will remain against it.
AL SHARPTON: Why are all the chickens in the story white? We need some black chickens.
DR. PHIL: The problem we have here is that this chicken won’t realize that he must first deal with the problem on this side of the road before it goes after the problem on the other side of the road. What we need to do is help him realize how stupid he’s acting by not taking on his current problems before adding new problems.
OPRAH: Well, I understand that the chicken is having problems, which is why he wants to cross this road so bad. So instead of having the chicken learn from his mistakes and take falls, which is a part of life, I’m going to give this chicken a car so that he can just drive across
the road and not live his life like the rest of the chickens.
BARNEY STIMPSON (HOW I MET YOUR MOTHER): Dude, you know we can’t talk about that, it’s covered in the Bro’s before Ho’s book. But I can tell you this, I got to see it with my very own eyes and it was totally AWESOME! It was I, Barney Stimpson, who saw what is now legen – wait for it – dary! (Contributed by Z-Dude and Ry-Guy)
ANDERSON COOPER, CNN: We have reason to believe there is a chicken, but we have not yet been allowed to have access to the other side of the road.
NANCY GRACE: That chicken crossed the road because he’s guilty! You can see it in his eyes and the way he walks.
PAT BUCHANAN: To steal the job of a decent, hardworking American.
MARTHA STEWART: No one called me to warn me which way that chicken was going. I had a standing order at the Farmer’s Market to sell my eggs when the price dropped to a certain level. No little bird gave me any insider information.
DR SEUSS: Did the chicken cross the road? Did he cross it with a toad? Yes, the chicken crossed the road, but why it crossed I’ve not been told.
ERNEST HEMINGWAY: To die in the rain, alone.
GRANDPA: In my day we didn’t ask why the chicken crossed the road. Somebody told us the chicken crossed the road, and that was good enough.
BARBARA WALTERS: Isn’t that interesting? In a few moments, we will be listening to the chicken tell, for the first time, the heart warming story of how it experienced a serious case of molting, and went on to accomplish it’s lifelong dream of crossing the road.
ARISTOTLE: It is the nature of chickens to cross the road.
JOHN LENNON: Imagine all the chickens in the world crossing roads together, in peace.
BILL GATES: I have just released eChicken2008, which will not only cross roads, but will lay eggs, file your important documents, and balance your checkbook. Internet Explorer is an integral part of eChicken2008. This new platform is much more stable and will never reboot.
ALBERT EINSTEIN: Did the chicken really cross the road, or did the road move beneath the chicken?
COLONEL SANDERS: Did I miss one?
Read On
As a writer, reading is required. There are a zillion reasons why a writer should read.
LibraryThing, therefore, is another necessity. This free (there is also a paid version with perks) membership allows you to catalog every book you own, have read or even hope to read. It allows you to connect with other readers and sometimes the authors. There are links allowing you to trade books or, if you’re that adventurous, leave a book behind somewhere conspicuous and track it as it makes it’s way into other people’s lives. Read the rest of this entry »







Recent Comments